PleaserefertoDisclosuresandDisclaimersattheendoftheResearchReport.
MarutiSuzuki
CelerioAMTtestdrive‐Willithaveabroadbasedappeal?
AUTOMOBILES:CompanyUpdate
26February2014
PhillipCapital (India) Pvt. Ltd.
We(myselfand4other colleagues includingafemale driver) took a testdrive
of Maruti’s Celerio with Automated Manual Transmission technology. On the
positiveside,theAMT offers convenience(particularlyintraffic )withgreatfuel
economyandintheclutchlessmanualmodetherideisprettysmooth.Onthe
otherhand,intheautomaticmode,thegearshiftsareunevencontributingtoa
poorride.Also,theproductseemstohavebeenpricedatadbitonthehigher
side. Overall, while it is certain to attract attention, it remains to be seen
whether the vehicle appeals to a
broadbaseofconsumers or will be confined
toanichecategory(firsttimedrivers;women).
Is the AMT smooth enough?The AMT version has the option of driving in an
automatic mode or in a clutchless manual mode. Our experienceswith the two
werevastlydifferent.
• Automaticmode:The
AMTisnotaconventionalautomatic(itdoesnothave
torqueconvertor)–itbasicallyutilizeshydraulicandelectricalactuatorsto
automatethegearshifts(readpage4fordetails).Whilethisensur eshigh
fueleconomyandlowercosts,itleadstoacompromisedridequality.During
thegearshifts
therewasaperceptiblepowerloss.Thelackofextra
accelerationmakesovertakingalittlechallenging.
• Manualmode:Inthemanualmode,thevehicleisasresponsiveasanyother
manual.Theclutchlesstransmissionmakesdrivingeasierwithoutaffecting
thedrivequality.Thefactthatthegearsautomaticallydownshift
toprevent
theenginefromstallingisafurtherconvenience.
Isthepriceaggressiveenough?Onthepositiveside,theAMTispricedjustabout
Rs 45,000 more than the Celerio’s manual version. This compares favourably to
conventional automatics that are typically priced ~Rs100,000 more than the
manualversions.
However,
on an absolute level, the price of the Celerio AMT is higher than the
effective on‐road price of a similar version of the Ritz and ~ 6% lower than the
Swift.Hence,abuyer would face the dilemma of choosing between apremium,
morepowerfulbetterfeaturedhatchbackand
theCeleriowiththeAMT.
Does the car have enough features?Maruti seems to have gone ahead with a
“safe”lookfortheCelerio–therearhasthelooksoftheAltowhilethefronthas
wrap around lamps (ala the Stingray). Overall, the vehicle is unlikely to attract
attentionbutwillnotturn offtoomanypeople.Ontheotherhand,theinteriors
seemroomierthantheWagonRbutfallsshortofthespaceinaSwift/Ritz.
Further while the car has a feature list worthy of an entry level hatchback; it
pales when compared to a
Swift/Ritz. This is important considering the minimal
pricedifferentialbetweentheC elerioAMTandtheRitz/Swift.
Outlook – strong innovation; trying to create a market. MSIL has taken a bold
moveintryingtoshifttheIndianmarkettowardstheautomatic.Webelievethat
while the technology offers great
convenience, the diffident ride quality and
slightly higher price point may be a deterrent. While the vehicle will definitely
attractattention,itsappealtoabroadcustomerbasemaynotbeacertainty.
NEUTRAL
MSILIN|CMPRS1666
TARGETRS1520(‐9%)
CompanyData
O/SSHARES(MN): 302
MARKETCAP(RSBN): 506
MARKETCAP(USDBN): 8.2
52‐WKHI/LO(RS): 1860/1215
LIQUIDITY3M(USDMN): 26.9
FACEVALUE(RS): 5
ShareHoldingPattern,%
PROMOTERS: 56.2
FII/NRI: 21.6
FI/MF: 14.0
NONPROMOTERCORP.HOLDINGS: 6.1
PUBLIC&OTHERS: 2.2
PricePerformance,%
1mth 3mth 1yr
ABS‐5.4 ‐0.1 16.2
RELTOBSE‐4.1 ‐1.3 8.3
PriceVs.Sensex(Rebasedvalues)
60
80
100
120
140
Apr‐10 Jun‐11 Aug‐12 Oct‐13
Maruti BSE Sensex
Source:Bloomberg,PhillipCapitalIndia
Research
OtherKeyRatios
Rs,mn FY14E FY15E FY16E
NetSales 413,411 471,751 541,448
EBITDA 52,581 60,317 67,136
NetProfit 28,585 33,321 38,131
EPS,Rs 94.6 110.3 126.2
PER,X 17.7 15.2 13.3
EV/EBIDTA,x 9.5 8.1 6.9
EV/NetSales,x 2.5 2.2 1.9
ROE,% 14.1 14.3 14.2
Debt/Equity(%) 6.9 6.0 5.2
Source:PhillipCapitalIndiaResearchEst.
DeepakJain(+912266679758)
PriyaRanjan(+912266679965)
Comments to this Manuals